Loading...
Planning & Design Meetings Auxiliary Gym Schematic Meeting Notes #1 10/14/2009 - MinutesPhysical Education Department Gunn High School 14 October 2009 Page 1 GUNN HIGH SCHOOL Palo Alto Unified School District MEETING NOTES DATE: 14 October 2009 SUBJECT: Gym: Schematic Design Meeting No. 1 ATTENDEES: Chris Horpel, Gunn Aimee Lopez, OCMI Erwin Lee, DLM Don Briggs, Gunn Ron Smith, PAUSD Peter L. Pearne, PAUSD The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the schematic design needs of the Physical Education Department. The following are the highlights of the meeting: 1. Erwin Lee (EL) handed out an updated budget matrix for the new Gym and existing Gym modernization. He explained the status of the budgets to date and noted how the two budgets are interrelated. 2. The primary point of discussion centered on the scope of work for the modernization of the existing Gymnasium and how the proposed increased scope impacts the new Gymnasium.  Chris Horpel (CH) questioned why Facilities thought the existing Gym wood floor needed replacement. He thought it had only been sanded once and could benefit from refinishing and restriping. He also said the existing bleachers could remain and the heating system worked well. Bleachers would be necessary during wrestling tournaments which were 5 times a year.  The group looked at ways to reduce the budget (on the handout). Aimee Lopez (AL) suggested not doing any work at the Weight Room short of removing the equipment and not including the work for new classrooms, as it was not part of the original scope.  Tom Hodges (TH) suggested not performing any of the mechanical work which was not in the original scope of work. This work could be performed on an as- needed basis using funds for planned maintenance.  Ron Smith (RS) said he thought the wood floor has been refinished multiple times. He said it was due for replacement as there are issues with soft spots and possible dry rot at the subfloor. Ewin Lee (EL) suggested that core samples be taken to determine its condition. Tom Hodges (TH) agreed to take this first step before making any decision and that RS should call a flooring contractor to make the investigation.  TH added that bid alternates could provide some options, the base bid being floor refinishing and an alternate being a new wood floor.  It was discussed whether or not to replace the bleachers. RS said existing bleachers needed replacing to avoid a maintenance liability. The group agreed to replace the bleachers on one wall in lieu of two. The seating capacity still needs to be determined.  The group agreed that the existing gym modernization scope include: replacement bleachers for one side only, minimize the work to create a classroom scope in the existing weight room, remove the curtain partition in the Physical Education Department Gunn High School 14 October 2009 Page 2 existing wrestling room, modify the wrestling room walls to include storage, and (pending the wood flooring study) refinish the gym floor.  It was agreed to first reconcile the budget costs for the new and existing gyms before taking their decision to the Facilities Steering Committee. 3. The secondary focus of the discussion was the new Gym. The major points discussed:  EL presented an updated floor plan that included new windows and overhead doors at the Weight/Fitness Room which was formerly called the Weight Room.  CH thought the changes were good but thought that the Weight/Fitness Room still needed to be larger and he would sacrifice some of the modernization work at the existing Gym to make it possible.  CH mentioned that the new bleachers should pull out in sections to allow space for the “booster” to set tables for concessions and displays.  CH thought that an additional set of restrooms is needed at the Tennis Courts.  Don Briggs (DB) thought that a storage room that opened from the exterior would be very beneficial. 4. Discussion followed on how to reduce the budget costs for the new Gym. The major points discussed.  CH mentioned that if necessary the Team Rooms could reduce in size. He needed a minimum of 15 lockers per room but preferred 18. Double-tier lockers were acceptable. He liked the type of bench that is attached to the lockers. EL noted that this style saves space but isn’t as practical for team meetings.  TH asked whether the Lobby and other front end rooms could be reduced in size. EL noted that the Tickets/Concessions could be reduced in size though not by much. The Lobby is about the right size given the amount of seating in the Gym.  It’s agreed that DLM will revisit the design of the Gym with an eye to reducing room sizes and maximizing efficiency of the layout. 5. A follow-up meeting will be scheduled to review the modification discussed today and to address other areas. END Prepared by Chris Ades of Deems Lewis McKinley. Please advise in writing if you feel that any of the above items are inaccurate. cc: Attendees File