Loading...
Planning & Design Meetings Neighborhood Meeting 12/2/2009 - Minutes 25 Churchill Avenue, Building ‘D’ ● Palo Alto, CA 94306 ● Phone 650.329.3935 ● Fax 650.327.3588 ● www.pausd.org MEASURE A – STRONG SCHOOLS BOND Gunn High School FSC Agenda 12/2/09 1. Welcome and Meeting to Order 2. Schematic Design Presentation 3. Air Conditioning Upgrade a. Operation Cost 4. Interim Parking Plan 5. Next Steps a. Schematic Design Budget Approval i. Next FSC Meeting, January 6, 2010 b. Schematic Design to the BOE i. Presentation, January 12, 2010 ii. Approval, January 12, 2010 6. Public Comments Gunn HS FACILITIES STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Palo Alto Unified School District 02 December 2009 P. 1 GUNN HIGH SCHOOL Palo Alto Unified School District FACILITIES STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING DATE: 02 December 2009, 12:30pm-2:00pm SUBJECT: Gunn HS Facilities Steering Committee ATTENDEES: Sign-in sheet (attached) The following are the highlights of the meeting: 1. Noreen Likins (NL) welcomed the committee, introduced student participants and opened the meeting. 2. Architect Erwin Lee (EL) shared that the presentation to the Board of Education (BOE) has been scheduled for next month, 12/8/09. The presentation given was originally prepared for the BOE. 3. EL began the power point presentation explaining the various design and plan developments to date: The Classroom Building A now has labs on each floor along with 14 classrooms. The over-sized classroom was omitted to allow room for the enlarged administration area and the Lab. The Resource Room has been made more rectangular. The courtyard of Classroom Building A was reduced to make room for the larger administration area, but it’s still generous and will allow significant light. The World Language Classroom has more shading devices. An Arrastradero sidewalk view was shown of the building that highlights this feature. EL noted that to introduce more variety the mansard roofs were not repeated in the new structures, but rather the new sloping roofs are compatible with the existing buildings and residential character of the area. The new buildings are also connected by covered walkways with similar scale and size to the exisitng. A view of the Gym from the parking area was presented that showed the scale of the new to existing Gym. Updated plan of the existing Gym showed a reduced scope of work which now includes: a new 500 seat bleacher on one side only, minor changes to convert a Locker Room to two classrooms, and the conversion of the fitness area to a wrestling room. Before and after views of the plans and building perspectives were shown to highlight the differences. These projects will be CHPS verified projects that will qualify by satisfying Gunn HS FACILITIES STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Palo Alto Unified School District 02 December 2009 P. 2 criteria in the categories of: sustainable site, water, energy, materials and indoor environmental quality.  Slides were shown that illustrated the progress of the landscape master plan including the tree inventory, tree mitigation criteria and tree studies at the new buildings identifying trees to be removed and saved.  A participant commented that in order to allow for more sun to strike the buildings, would the landscape architect consider more deciduous trees. EL answered that yes, this would be an important consideration.  A participant asked if relocation of the substation was considered. EL said that yes it was, but in order to maintain the existing connections the decision was made to remain and keep costs down. 4. Tom Hodges (TH) noted that the District would not ask Gunn to offset the increased operating costs associated with the addition of AC to the campus. He also asked the group to vote on whether to pursue Option 1 or Option 2 for air conditioning the existing buildings. NL noted that this vote was taken at the last FSC meeting. Option 2 was again chosen which means that the AC work will proceed for all buildings as part of Group 1 work.  5. Aimee Lopez (AL) distributed an updated Interim Parking Plan that illustrated traffic patterns and bicycles parking areas, both temporary and permanent. The following discussion followed: Tom Jacoubowsky (TJ) noted that the ratios of student and staff parking should remain the same throughout the construction process. This means that some parking in the main lot will need to be re-striped with labels as a number of staff parking at Miranda will be lost. A participant asked whether the bicycle parking would be covered. AL responded that it was not planned for. NL noted that the temporary bicycle parking area by the amphitheater is undesirable as all the space is required for graduation. Chris Ades (CA) responded that other locations are being considered. A participant asked if the area by the Tennis sheds could be used for bicycle parking. AL noted that this area will be part of the construction zone and not useable. NL suggested that the group should walk the site to help determine the best bicycle parking zones. AL agreed and will set up a site walk for the next FSC meeting in January. 6. NL opened up the meeting to the public and discussion followed. Participant asked what would happen to the tennis courts and tennis program during construction. NL responded that like the swimming pool which was lost for a while during construction of the new pool, the school would just do without and find alternative facilities. She noted that the tennis courts would be unavailable for 18-24 months. Participant asked whether or not the projects could be done in stages to minimize disruption. NL answered that in order to lower construction costs all three new buildings would be constructed in tandem. Participant expressed concern for the quality of the tennis program during the down-time and cautioned against losing their current coach. NL answered that Gunn HS FACILITIES STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Palo Alto Unified School District 02 December 2009 P. 3 like the pool program, the program may suffer some but that the school would do their best to find alternative facilities satisfactory to the tennis coach. TJ noted that the CM, Gilbane Construction, has a good track record for project delivery and he’s confident the project will stay on schedule. 7. Schedule: Next Monthly FPC meeting will be scheduled for Jan. 6th at 12:30 PM. END Prepared by Christopher Ades of Deems Lewis McKinley. Please advise if you feel that any of the above items are inaccurate or need further clarification or detail. cc: Attendees File Bldg. sf cost/ sf Total L 19,280 24 $462,720 L31 3,250 24 $78,000 M 13,680 24 $328,320 Total 36,210 Total $869,040 Total Project Cost $1,086,300 Bldg. sf Cost/ sf Total L 19,280 24 $462,720 L31 3,250 24 $78,000 M 13,680 24 $328,320 S 20,970 24 $503,280 A 8,770 24 $210,480 IA 15,980 24 $383,520 Total 81,930 Total $1,966,320 Total Project Cost $2,457,900   Bldg. sf Cost/ sf Total Gym 20,420 Included M & E 38,980 Included World L 6,650 Included Total 66,050 Total   Construction CostOption 1 Gunn High School Air Conditioning Cost Estimate Group 1 Construction Cost Option 2 Construction Cost cost / sf / Year Total 0.817 $15,754 0.817 $2,656 0.817 $11,178 Total $29,587 cost / sf / Year Total 0.817 $15,754 0.817 $2,656 0.817 $11,178 0.817 $17,135 0.817 $7,166 0.817 $13,057   Total $66,945   cost / sf / Year Total No AC   0.817 $31,851 0.817 $5,434 Total $37,284   Operating Cost Operating Cost Operating Cost