Loading...
Planning & Design Meetings Ohlone Site Committee Meeting 2/24/2009 - Minutes 1 of 2 450 Geary Street, Suite 100, San Francisco, CA 94102 tel 415.346.4040 fax 415.346.4103 mail@gelfand-partners.com www.gelfand-partners.com Meeting Notes Project: Project No: Date: Ohlone Elementary School 0819 March 3, 2009 Meeting Subject: Ohlone Site Committee Meeting Meeting Date: February 24, 2009 at 4:30 PM Location: Ohlone Elementary School Those Present: Susan Charles Principal, Ohlone Barbara Portman Ohlone Site Committee Bill Overton Ohlone Site Committee Nico Janik Ohlone Site Committee Ken Shark Ohlone Site Committee Lori Alvarez PAUSD Thomas Hodges O’Connor/PAUSD Chris Duncan GPA Steven Korovesis GPA Ashley Drum GPA The following new items were discussed: New Items Action By ITEM 2.1 Community Meeting fyi GPA recapped the Community Meeting on February 5. Only one neighbor has voiced concern about parents parking in front of his house during pickup and drop-off hours. Susan would like to thank all of Ohlone’s neighbors for their support. 2.2 Commute Load Data fyi/GPA Nico Janik presented data on how students get to Ohlone. Approximately 50% of students are driven and 50% have other means. 5% carpool. GPA to meet with John Wilson, the traffic engineer for the project, to further discuss these issues. 2.3 Building Options fyi GPA presented the pros and cons of each building option. fyi Option A: 2-story building by the farm. This option has a smaller footprint than the 1- story which means it allows for more green space. It creates a strong connection between the school and the farm. The current portables could stay in place during construction which would limit the disturbance to students and staff. A 2-story option would have a higher construction cost. There is also the option to locate the building along the back fence and redwoods. This option can be discussed further after the board recommendation. fyi Option B: 1-story building in place of current portables. This option would allow for higher classroom ceilings and more natural day lighting at the front of the classrooms. It would have a lower construction cost than a 2-story option. This option would require the current portables to be relocated during construction which would be included in the total cost of the project. fyi Option C: 2-story building by playground. This option would break up the large central space by creating a more intimate courtyard between the new and existing buildings. However, construction in the center of campus will be very difficult and disruptive to students and staff. fyi An additional option was discussed with (3) 1-story, 4 classroom buildings in the center of the campus. This layout would create small courtyards between each of the new buildings but would greatly reduce the overall open space. 2.4 Daycare Portables fyi/GPA In an effort to make the daycare portables more accessible to parents, Tom Hodges proposed that the portables be moved toward the front of the farm along the fire lane. This would reconfigure the farm to include additional space along the back fence of the school. GPA to future investigate this option. 2.5 Budget fyi The current budget for the project is approximately $7 million. fyi The current budget allows for a classroom size of 960 sf. This size is based on cost and exit code issues. 2.6 Recommendations fyi The site committee recommended option A – a 2-story building located near the farm. GPA to present this recommendation to the board. Meeting Notes 2 of 2 End of Meeting Notes These notes will be considered substantially correct and complete unless otherwise notified in writing within five working days of receipt.